Categories
Movies Review

REVIEW – Thor: Love & Thunder

Taika Waititi’s second turn directing an adventure for Marvel’s trademarked version of the Norse God of Thunder feels like a streamlined Cliffs Notes version of itself — this is a film I absolutely believe has a rough Director’s Cut featuring at least an extra hour sitting on a hard disk somewhere. But the version released to theaters is perfectly enjoyable, charming, and hits all the beats it needs to tell its tale. Chris Hemsworth‘s Thor is still, in the wake of the grand AVENGERS finale, hanging out with the Guardians of the Galaxy, when alerts from all across said galaxy start ringing out that someone is killing all the gods. That someone is Gorr the God-Butcher (a manically grinning Christian Bale), a man whose god turned out to be an asshole, therefore once he was empowered to do so he started killing gods. Upon discovering that Asgard is Gorr’s next stop, Thor and his pal Korg (director Waititi) zip down to Earth to stop him, only to discover — wait, Jane Foster (Natalie Portman) now ALSO has the Power of Thor?! Yes, bless Taika Waititi for bringing her back to do a riff on that four-ish year stretch of Jason Aaron’s long run writing THOR comics; Jane is wielding a reconstituted Mjolnir whose enchantment adds a foot to her height, turns her straight dark hair into magnificent golden locks, and enables her to smash baddies as effectively as her passive-aggressive divine ex. Alongside an action-starved Valkyrie (Tessa Thompson), the two Thors, Korg, and a pair of large noisy goats the Odinson picked up in his time with the Guardians set forth to wreck Gorr’s plans to annihilate all so-called deities across the cosmos. Bale turns in a fascinating performance as Gorr, but it feels fragmented, like with a little more screen time the cackling, manic parts and the cooler, calculating parts might knit together a little more effectively. Hemsworth’s Thor is still being written in the goofy, blustering mode Waititi used in RAGNAROK, but things do get real when lives and heartbreak are at stake (and there’s a couple of scenes where the bluster turns positively charming as he’s addressing a group of Asgardian children). I’ve seen others write of the film’s tonal whiplash, but A. it didn’t bother me much, and B. I swear that’s a product of the tight edit — this thing never stops to breathe. I would be remiss if I didn’t mention the bonkers side-trip to the golden city of the gods where our heroes meet Russell Crowe‘s lunatic version of Zeus, with his mighty lightning bolt, weird-ass accent, and little sheer skirt. It’s a playfully over-the-top performance that has the side effect of making you think Gorr might have the right idea, the film’s crazy juxtaposition of tones actually feeding into one of its core ideas nicely. I think I do have to agree with others that RAGNAROK is the sturdier, more cohesive work, but LOVE AND THUNDER is still a cheerful rock’n’roll sci-fi epic of magical mayhem with all the moments of joyful triumph and shocking sorrow you’d hope for. It’s just one that feels like it’s missing anywhere from twenty minutes to an hour. (Amazingly, the audience we saw it with remembered to keep butts in seats for the two post-script scenes.)

Categories
Movies Review

REVIEW – Jurassic World: Dominion

Okay, so second sequel in a row where I didn’t see the previous movies — and unlike TOP GUN, this one felt like it did leave me at a disadvantage. The reason I was in the theater, however, was because this of course is the JURASSIC WORLD movie where they bring back the original cast of JURASSIC PARK — and it’s funny for me to be interested for that reason, because when I was twelve years old I didn’t particularly like JURASSIC PARK; surly tween Captain JLS wasn’t buying the awe and wonder Spielberg was selling and mostly just wanted to see dinosaurs rend and eat people — which happened, but not enough for my middle school bloodlust. I vibed more with with the grisly sequel a few years later that centered Jeff Goldblum‘s sardonic mathematician Ian Malcolm and featured, among other sights, a T-rex stomping through a backyard and chomping down on a family dog. (Clearly I just have a thing for grim Spielberg sequels; TEMPLE OF DOOM remains my favorite Indiana Jones film.)

The plot that Michael Crichton’s original characters as reinterpreted by Spielberg find themselves embroiled in feels like something that could have been an unrelated Crichton novel; giant prehistoric locusts are wiping out fields across the midwest, but not touching anything grown from seeds sold by the biotech firm Biosyn. Laura Dern‘s Ellie Sattler suspects that they’re Biosyn’s locusts, and recruits her old friend Dr. Alan Grant (Sam Neill) to join her at Biosyn’s compound, where she’s been invited by the aforementioned Ian Malcolm, who is now working as some kind of in-house lecturer — and who has a plan to get them all the evidence they need.

Categories
Movies Review

REVIEW – Top Gun: Maverick

First off, let me admit that, unlike nearly everyone else in my age group, I’ve never seen the original TOP GUN; for some reason, our household in the ’80s & ’90s just was not a Tom Cruise-filmgoing household, and I somehow managed to miss it on HBO and every other cable channel as well. My filmgoing has lots of weird gaps like that; like, I’d never seen JAWS until it came out on Blu-Ray. And yet, through the MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE films I’ve come around to the Church of Cruise, Patron Saint of Cinema who continues to cheat death for our entertainment — at this point, it would feel wrong not to bear witness to his latest half-mad feat of filmmaking. Thing is, despite not actually having seen the original ’80s film, a lot felt familiar here just through cultural osmosis — ah yes, there’s “Highway to the Danger Zone,” there’s Harold Faltermeyer’s extremely ’80s synth theme, there’s Tom Cruise on a motorcycle racing a jet at the golden hour, and so on.

Mercifully, Joseph Kosinski’s film (his second sequel to a beloved ’80s flick in about a decade; his directorial debut was 2010’s TRON: LEGACY) gives you everything you need to know to understand what’s going on. Tom Cruise is Captain Pete “Maverick” Mitchell, a perpetual loose cannon Naval aviator who has deliberately avoided promotion in order to keep flying planes well into his fifties. Having danced between the lines of regulations yet again, before he can be reprimanded his former wingman, Admiral Tom “Iceman” Kazanski (Val Kilmer), orders him back to TOPGUN as an instructor to prepare the current best of the best for an incredibly dangerous mission that — let’s face it — is basically the trench run from the original STAR WARS.

Categories
Movies Review

REVIEW – Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness

Director Sam Raimi (the EVIL DEAD movies, the first SPIDER-MAN trilogy, and DARKMAN, to name his most relevant credits here) makes his first new film in just shy of a decade, and it’s a simultaneously convoluted yet simple quest adventure sequel to not just Scott Derrickson’s first DOCTOR STRANGE from 2016 but also a laundry list of other Marvel-branded entertainment. And somehow it largely works! It’s not as uniquely its director’s baby as, say, THOR RAGNAROK or the GUARDIANS flicks — but as with Shane Black and IRON MAN 3, you can definitely see Raimi’s fingerprints all over it. The whole thing is soaked in Raimi’s particular visual language — from the tense edits, jump scares, and creatures that recall his early horror work to inventive scene transitions and overlaps that remind me of some of his more unique visual touches from DARKMAN all those decades back.

Categories
Movies Review

REVIEW – The Unbearable Weight of Massive Talent / The Northman

Well THERE’S a tonally disparate double-feature — a comedic action riff on a beloved actor’s eccentric public persona followed by a meticulously researched and exceedingly UN-comedic riff on the story underlying one of the most famous tragic plays of all time.